Solar for Free?

August 30, 2010

Plus if you act now……

We thought we’d get your attention with that headline, but in some parts of America it’s an accurate statement.

Warning:  math. follows.

Here’s the Washington D.C. home of Russ Gaskin and Bernadette Morales Gaskin and their family, with its newly installed 7-kW PV array.

The installation is expected to cover 60% – 80% of their electrical needs.  Total dollar hit?  According to the Gaskins’ numbers (see below), around zero…

Project cost (inc. installation, permitting, etc.)                   $36500
less 30% Federal investment tax credit                             $10950
less DC Renewable Energy Incentive Program rebate       $17260

Net cost                                                                            $  8290


Have I got a deal for you…

As for that eight thousand dollar balance, the Gaskins will be able to recoup that by selling the Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SREC)* they will earn from their generation of clean energy.  While they could do this in a somewhat speculative way by finding buyers on the spot market and taking advantage of variable SREC prices, they’re also thinking seriously about locking in this income stream by entering into an agreement with an SREC aggregator, Sol Systems LLC.

Sol Systems’ part in the deal is to buy the SRECs, aggregate them with the SRECs of other generators, and sell them as a group to utilities needing to satisfy RPS requirements.  The Gaskins have the option of taking a one-time upfront payment of $10,000 from Sol Systems, or five years’-worth of quarterly payments at $325/kW/year.  Whichever option they choose, it will more than cover that outstanding eight thousand dollars.

In addition, the District of Columbia allows customer-generators to net meter (offsetting their utility bills by the amount of power they generate) without reducing the value of those SRECs.

What kind of a deal have you got?

The above rather attractive math. works in different (often less generous) ways in different parts of the country.  Check out your part in the excellent DSIRE database here.

For Washingtonians, the combination of federal credits, local rebates and SRECs makes the argument very clearly that solar is not a fuel of the future – it’s ready now!

The paradox has to be noted, however, that while the District of Columbia practices an enlightened solar energy policy for its residents, those legislators who make the District their place of work seem to be as unenlightened as a mob of luddites.  Around the country and around the world, state and national governments are advancing policy to ease their citizens’ way into clean power generation.  Here in our country’s seat of power, where Congress has failed to advance any kind of energy legislation for over a year, our leaders seem to be oblivious to the benefits being enjoyed by citizens living within a couple of miles of them.

We’re not sure what exactly is going on in “the world’s greatest deliberative body”, but progress it isn’t.  As Bernadette cogently points out: “Instead of subsidizing coal, oil and other polluting energy sources, our government should be subsidizing solar and other renewable and clean energy sources.”

Russ and Bernadette are two Washingtonians who’ve found their place in the sun.  Those few hundred who’ll be returning to work in Washington in a week’s time still haven’t.

*RECs provide a potential stream of revenue for renewable energy generators.  In many parts of the USA, RECs are traded as a commodity or used directly to fulfill the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirement of a utility or large energy enerator.  Thus, if a state has an RPS in place, utilities must satisfy their share of that RPS by producing a mandated amount of its electricity generation from renewable sources (or make an alternative compliance payment).  They can do this by building and operating their own renewable facilities, but most satisfy the law by purchasing RECs from customer-generators like the Gaskins.

7 Responses to “Solar for Free?”

  1. Wendy Pearson Says:

    You can see current SREC prices and calculate what how big a lump sump you can sell your SREC now at http://www.SRECTrade.com

    A 7kW system’s SREC would be worth around $11,800 in DC, $13,100 in MD and $21,000 in NJ

  2. Chris Stimpson Says:

    Wendy:

    Thanks for the tip and the link. Anyone else with good leads out there?

  3. Tom Says:

    I think the math is off, the rebate is not part of the tax basis for the 30% FITC.
    Math should be:
    $36,500
    less $17,260
    Tax basis = $19,240
    30% of $19,240 = $5,772 FITC
    Net cost = $13,468

    Still a good deal when you sell the SRECS!

  4. Bernadette Gaskin Says:

    On the question of do you have to subtract the DDOE rebate from the total cost BEFORE taking your 30% federal tax credit? Our solar coop lawyers say NO. Apparently, the language in the bill changed, and it used to say NET after incentives, that language was removed.
    http://www.mtpleasantsolarcoop.org
    I don’t have specific details on this law change, somebody will have to dig it up. But we are going with what the coop says.

  5. Gillian Black Says:

    You can take the 30% fed tax credit on the gross system cost or the net cost after rebate. It generally works out better if taken on the gross, however, this can lead to fed taxes due on the rebate amount. This “taxable rebate” issue is still a bit cloudy, so should be fielded by your accountant.

  6. Rosana Francescato Says:

    This all sounds great–what about condos? I live in a condo complex in San Francisco and have been looking into ways to get a solar system installed, even if just for the common electricity. I’d like to use the local PACE program if that ever starts up again, because that would allow us to cover solar and even more. But our HOA board thinks that would be too complicated legally. Another option could be a lease or power purchase agreement. Any thoughts on the options? Thanks!

  7. Chris Stimpson Says:

    Rosana:
    The problem with condos and, for that matter, any rented dwelling, is that you don’t own the roof you want to put the panels on! So your HOA is probably anticipating problems from other condo-owners who wonder why part of THEIR condo fee is going to finance YOUR clean electricity; (alternatively, what happens when you sell and the buyer doesn’t want the panels…..?)
    I don’t think PACE would impact your particular issue.
    An enlightened HOA could probably find ways around the issue, but on the other hand, how often do you see the words ‘enlightened’ and ‘HOA’ juxtaposed in a sentence? You may need to gather some support from the homeowners around you (and find an installer who will offer a discount for a guaranteed minimum number of installations).
    Re lease or PPAs, check out this article in SOLAR TODAY magazine:
    http://www.solartoday-digital.org/solartoday/20100809#pg44
    (lots of good stuff in that mag, by the way).
    Again, however, you still have the ‘roof ownership’ issue – it would, for example, be a lease arrangement with the HOA, not you (unless, as I say, you can get the HOA’s legal dept. to be creative!)

Leave a Reply

Join Us Now!